Keeping Up with the Blogosphere

I’m not the only one struggling.

I use a feed reader (endo) to follow about 30 feeds in a wide range of topics. At least I try to. The trouble is, if I skip a day reading the feeds, no one tells the authors to stop writing. They just keep churning out new material. The result: as I type this, there are 1188 unread blog entries waiting for me in endo.


Why Don’t I Just Do It?

Why don’t I read them regularly? Well, one of the reasons I subscribe to all these feeds is because they give me food for thought. I’ll read an article and think about it and, in some cases, it’ll get the creative juices flowing so I can write a blog entry based on what I’ve read.

Perfect example is the article I wrote yesterday about notebooks and scratchpads. It wasn’t a good article — I’ll be the first to admit that — primarily because I threw it together without giving it enough thought. (My husband was rushing me. He wanted to go out to dinner. Can you imagine putting food before blogging?) But the seed that became the article came from a blog entry (which I now can’t find) recommending that bloggers keep a notebook beside their computers. I think that’s incredible advice — and it goes against what all the geeks out there recommend — and I realize that I follow it. I wanted to explain why it’s good advice by explaining how I follow it. My post didn’t communicate the story the way I wanted it to, but that’s where the idea came from.

Thinking takes time, which brings up…

…the Other Reason

I simply don’t have the time to read (and think) about them all.

Now you might tell me that I can make the time. And I’d tell you that I really do need to sleep at night and get some paying work done during the day.

I stumbled upon a blog post today, written by Lincoln Adams, who evidently really likes to punish himself with this stuff. From “Can I get back to blogging now??” on Habitation of Justice:

Honestly, I don’t know how some people do it. It took me literally all day just to check out places like Digg, Reddit, MyBlogLog, and so on. Just to read the latest feeds from my newsreader sucked up so much time that before I knew it, it was 3AM and my brain was fried from fatigue and an overload of information. How do people find time not only to sift through the all the crap out there, but also blog 20 posts a day AND work a full time job on top of that? My goodness.

My goodness, too!

Apparently, Lincoln and I have the same problem, only he’s taking it more seriously than I am by actually trying to keep up. I don’t think he writes 20 blog posts a day and I know I don’t. But even two or three can be tough when you’re doing so much other stuff.

Read Less Feeds?

Of course, you might tell me that I should subscribe to fewer feeds. And I’d tell you that I think you’ve got something there.

But which ones to remove? Lately, I’ve been adding more feeds than I’ve been removing.

But I’m starting to think that the ones without full-text feeds will be the ones to go first. Like’s feeds. I don’t subscribe to the entire magazine — I did for a while and quickly put an end to that. I subscribe to about 10 different columns. And the problem I have is that all that appears in my feed reader is a tease to get me to the site. While it only takes a few moments to click a link and see if the article is worth reading in full, it would be quicker and easier if I just scanned it in endo. And it would certainly prevent me from being distracted by links to other articles on Slate’s site.

I’m Too Interesting…I Mean Interested

I think my main problem is interests. I have too many of them.

I’m interested in blogging and productivity. I’m interested in writing and traveling. I’m interested in photography and flying. I’m interested in politics and religion — as an observer (rather than a participant) in both. I’m just interested in too much stuff.

And the blogosphere is a great place to find information and viewpoints about all kinds of stuff. So how could I turn up the chance to suck in some fresh new content?

So I subscribe to a bunch of blogs and I wade through all that content when I have time.

I mean find time.

No, I mean make time.

I think I’d better make some time right now. If you’ll excuse me…

6 thoughts on “Keeping Up with the Blogosphere

  1. Thanks for the ping and for visiting! :-)

    I think part of the solution is considering that a lot of the info is redundant, so if you drop one feed, chances are whatever you missed will be mentioned in another feed you still subscribe to.

    It’s also a given that many people will cast a very wide net at the beginning, trying to keep up with so many feeds and sites that finding the last number of Pi will seem like a realistic achievement in comparison. But as time goes on, I think you’ll begin to prioritize and sacrifice those feeds that don’t turn out to be as useful as you hoped.

    I think that’s how veteran bloggers got started. they either blogged or they didn’t, spending most of their time tweaking and building their database of feeds until it eventually evolved into something they could personally handle. Far from being done overnight, I suspect this is something that spanned several years.

    Personally, I have over 50 feeds, which was cut down from ohh, maybe 500. :-D but I’ll be cutting down even more as I’ve noticed that I tend to completely skip over some feeds.

    Finally, I think the important thing is to focus on drawing visitors to you, and establishing a network of people with common interests, and who’ll likely prove to be a valuable well of resources that you wouldn’t have been able to find any other way. As much as I’d like to see traffic explode on my site, I’m looking for a particular audience of people to attract to my blog, people who would probably share similar goals, personalities and interests. Eventually, the experience of having a small but established readership may prove to be more of a valuable source of information than even 5000 feeds could provide. :-)

  2. Lincoln, thanks so much for taking the time to visit and comment. Comments from visitors are so important on any blog — they bring in various points of view to expand on my initial posts. This blog has a decent amount of visitors, but a low percentage share their comments. Your comment is really appreciated.

    That said, I guess I’m still in the feed fine-tuning stage. Adding feeds, removing the ones I don’t read. Eventually, I’ll have it pinned down. At this point, I think I’ll have to set aside a whole day each week just to go through the feeds and flag the articles I want to read again. And maybe another day to work on the flagged articles. How many days in a week? I wish the Beatles were right about eight days.

    Thanks for your insight. I hope to attract the kinds of visitors who will take advantage of the comments feature to share their insight with all of us.

  3. You’re very welcome!

    I’m actually getting bored with some of my feeds, so that’s been helpful. I think once I start to focus on a particular niche, things will get easier from there. of course Rome wasn’t built in a day, so I don’t expect to have the perfect mount of all the best feeds in that amount of time either. ;-)

    Keep on blogging!

  4. Maria, great and insightful post.

    I’m pretty amazed that you manage to only follow 30 feeds. I must be subscribed to hundreds (yours having been added to my reader just a few days ago!). I’d be interested in your opinion of endo… I use Vienna on OS X, and GreatNews on Windows. I do find having an offline newsreader useful, since it means I can catch up on my reader when I’m on a plane or train, for example. There’s an issue though, that I see the same things twice, once on Windows at work and once on OS X at home… and that wouldn’t happen if I used a web-based reader.

    The problem I’ve found is the volume of interesting stuff – like you, there are a wide variety of topics I follow – and the desire to comment on or follow up on the entries. That’s the essence of good participation in the blogosphere, and I constantly feel guilty that I don’t comment more often.

    You might like to check out my Quicksand of Web 2.0 post, too… and that was written before I got into Twitter… :-)

What do you think?