Archive

Posts Tagged ‘NPR’

What’s More Important: Your Beliefs or Your Follower Count?

August 15th, 2010 by Maria Langer

Should you really be worried about losing followers for voicing your opinion on blogs and social networks?

About two weeks ago, I linked to a story on NPR.org titled “Redefining Empathy in Light of web’s Long Memory.” The basis of the story is the sad fact that people have been losing their jobs or having old personal information resurface publicly because of information posted on the Web. This information isn’t usually damaging when looked at objectively, but when taken out of context or examined through magnifying glasses wielded by small-minded people, they can be embarrassing — or in one instance covered in the story, ruin someone’s life.

I linked to the story on Twitter because a very close Twitter friend, who is new to social networking, had been making foolish comments on Twitter and Facebook — comments far more likely to get her in trouble than the examples in the story. But it was another Twitter friend who replied:

That article is a good reason for not posting politics or religious views online. I’ve had followers drop me for posting religious

The tweet was cut off by Twitter’s 140-character minimum, but you can end it with the word “views” or “articles” and you’ll get the gist of what he was saying.

Indeed, I know exactly what he means. Although he and I share general religious views — that is, we’re non-believers — he had a tendency to link to the more radically inspired content online, content that could be seen as seriously offensive by believers. (Hell, some of it even offended me to the point that I stopped following his links.) While it’s one thing to read and link to logic-based arguments against religion by the likes of Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris, it’s quite another to read and link to “radical atheist” content. It’s one thing to say, “I don’t believe and here’s why;” it’s another to say “You’re a moron for believing.”

I did notice that he’d stopped tweeting so many of those links, but it wasn’t until his response above that I realized why.

And this got me thinking about something else: why we blog or participate in social networks.

Does Follower Count Matter?

Follower count is never something that concerned me — especially on Twitter. The vast majority of people on Twitter don’t actively participate. How can they when some of them are following hundreds or thousands of people? Twitter would become a full-time job if you actually read the tweets of more than 100-200 people.

(This, by the way, is one of the reasons I’ve never followed more than 140 people at a time and am constantly dropping noisemakers in favor of thought-provokers. I actually read the tweets in my timeline. You can read more about my thoughts on the follower count game in “Twitter is NOT a Popularity Contest.”)

So if so few followers actually read and respond to what you say, the overall value of followers is diminished. You’re not networking when the communication is ignored. That leaves me to wonder why people should actually care about how many followers they have.

After all, it’s not the quantity of your followers, it’s the quality. I’d rather have just 10 followers who interact with me daily than 5,000 followers who seem to ignore everything I say. It’s the networking aspect of Twitter that attracts me.

Should Your Social Networking Activities be a Lie?

So that brings up the more serious ramifications of my Twitter friend’s tweet: changing what he tweets to preserve follower count. Even though he reads radical atheist content and obviously feels strongly about it — strong enough to share it, anyway — he stopped sharing it because he doesn’t want to lose followers.

“…a good reason for not posting politics or religious views online…” are his exact words. But I’ll argue this: if your political or religious views are important to you, why should you hide them? They are part of your personal makeup — they’re what make you who you are. To pretend that they’re not is akin to lying about who you are.

To omit them from your social networking activities will prevent you from finding other people who share the same views you have. And isn’t that why we participate in social networks? To meet and interact with people who share similar views?

The Special Case of Bloggers

Bloggers, of course, face this dilemma in a much more magnified way. Our blog posts aren’t limited to 140 characters a pop. We can go on and on about any topic we like, linking to content, quoting content, opining on the values of that content. We can make complex arguments for or against anything we like. Or we can simply share a link and let our readers do their own homework, forming their own opinions about a topic without help from us.

Either way, the blog post is out there and it stays out there. It’s not 140 characters that flit through the Twitter timelines of the people who follow us, disappearing almost as quickly as they appeared. It’s out there, archived, accessible, searchable. There are comments associated with it, RSS feeds that direct to it, other blogs (and even feed-scraped sploggs) that link to it.

Should bloggers be concerned about sharing their opinions on controversial topics such as politics and religion?

It all depends on what they’re trying to achieve with their blogs. If their blogs exist to voice opinions on these topics, being shy would defeat their purpose. If their blogs exist as a personal journal of what’s going on in their lives and minds (like mine does for me), hiding their thoughts about these things — especially when these things are important to them — would be akin to putting up a false front to their readers — and betraying themselves. But if their blogs are intended to showcase a product or service or way of life, adding their opinions on non-related controversial topics is probably not a good idea.

The Importance of Being True to Yourself

And then there are people like me: people who have non-mainstream opinions but, because of their work, should probably present a mainstream face to the public. I’m sure there are a lot of us out there, but it was only recently that I found someone with a situation so similar to mine that I took great comfort in his blog’s existence. (I’m referring to Ted Landau‘s Slanted Viewpoint.)

While I don’t consider my opinions extreme, I know they’re not mainstream. They are shared by quite a few people, but usually not the outspoken ones you see on television. (It’s ironic to me that the “conservatives” are the loudest, most outspoken Americans; what’s that about?) Still, when I write a blog post voicing my opinions about something like religion or politics, I get a lot of nasty, hateful feedback from readers who seem to have gone out of their way to visit my blog and blast me. The most obvious example, which amazes me to this day, is the outrage of “Christians” over my post, “The Bible in the Refrigerator.” These people got so abusive in comments that I had to shut the comments down. (And don’t bother entering a comment about that post here; it won’t appear.)

So what do I do? Betray myself by pretending not to be outraged by the stupidity and ignorance I see in today’s world — just to make the mainstream happy? Pretend that I’m not offended by having someone else’s religion thrust on me every day of my life? Pretend that I’m content with a political system rendered ineffective by partisanship bullshit?

Does the world really need yet another middle-of-the road blogger? I don’t think so.

But what’s more important is this: Do I pretend I’m someone I’m not just to maximize the appeal of my blog to readers? Do I sell myself out just to give all the “fans” of my books a warm and cuddly feeling about me?

The answer, of course, is no. Because just like Twitter follower count, the number of blog readers or subscribers is meaningless to me. What matters is the quality of the readers, not the quantity. I want my blog read by people who are smart, people who can think, people who can comment with their opinions — whether they agree or disagree — in a clear, unoffensive way that furthers the discussion and makes me — and other readers — think.

So I’ll put that question to everyone who participates in social networking: What’s more important, your beliefs or your follower count?

Deep Thoughts, On Blogging, Social Networking , , , ,

Did you enjoy this post? If so, please comment on it or share a little link love:
Add to Del.icio.us Add to Del.icio.us    Technorati This Technorati This    Digg This Digg This    Stumble It Stumble it!    Twit This Tweet This

Interesting Links, August 4, 2010

August 4th, 2010 by Maria Langer

Here are links I found interesting on August 4, 2010:

  • Topic of Cancer – Christopher Hitchen writes about his battle with cancer. Best wishes, Hitch!
  • Anger and The Aftermath – "Not everyone who poops on you is bad; not everyone who saves you from poop is good; if you are up to your neck in poop, for heaven’s sake, keep your mouth shut." Great blog post about anger and social media. Read more on QuinnCreative. Thanks to @EstherSchindler for sharing the link.
  • Kasell, Hemmert join Radio Hall of Fame’s Class of 2010 – "National Public Radio veteran Carl Kasell and Chicago rock radio icon Terri Hemmert will be among this year’s inductees in the National Radio Hall of Fame. But once again, voters have snubbed two of America’s pioneering shock jocks — Howard Stern and Steve Dahl — denying them entry in the Chicago-based shrine." Congratulations! Read more on blogs.vocalo.org.
  • The Book Bench: Too Hard Not to Cheat in the Internet Age? – "Excusing plagiarism as some sort of modern-day academic mash-up won’t teach students anything more than to how lie and get away with it. We should be teaching students how to produce original work…" Read more by Elizabeth Minkle in The New Yorker.
  • NOT Sarah Palin’s Friends – "The Facebook posts Palin doesn't want you to see." Sarah Palin's Facebook page is screened and wall posts are removed regularly. John Dickerson at Slate tells you about the deleted wall posts, captured through a special software program before they are deleted. Sarah Palin, made to look like a gift from God. It makes me sick. On Slate.com.
  • Would You Like Some Help? – Remember Clippy?
  • 5 reasons why people hate Apple – "Every company has its opponents, but Apple really gets people worked up. Some people hate Apple a lot, more than they hate Nazis or Smurfs. They leave angry comments on Apple blogs. Based on my extensive observations of the species, Apple-haters fall into five categories. If you're an Apple-hater, which one of these categories do you fit in?" By Mitch Wagoner. Read more on Computerworld.

This just in... , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Did you enjoy this post? If so, please comment on it or share a little link love:
Add to Del.icio.us Add to Del.icio.us    Technorati This Technorati This    Digg This Digg This    Stumble It Stumble it!    Twit This Tweet This

Interesting Links, July 29, 2010

July 29th, 2010 by Maria Langer

Here are links I found interesting on July 29, 2010:

  • Redefining Empathy In Light Of Web’s Long Memory – "In an era when 75% of employers research applicants online, erasing youthful indiscretions is next to impossible. Jeffrey Rosen accepts that parts of private lives become public on the Internet, but hopes that it will lead us to be more forgiving of one another's missteps." Read more on NPR.org.
  • Oversight Of Immigration At Heart Of Arizona Ruling – "Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer says her state will ask the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday to let all of its controversial immigration law take effect, a day after a federal judge in Phoenix blocked key parts of the measure." Who is going to pay for this legal battle? Arizonans? American citizens? I'm a member of both groups and I'm sick of throwing away my tax dollars on political posturing. Read more about the ruling on NPR.
  • 100 million Facebook users’ details published online – " The personal details of 100 million Facebook users have been collected and published online in a downloadable file, meaning they will now be unable to make their publicly available information private." This is just the kind of thing that should teach people to keep their private info OFF social networking systems. As for the guy who made this available to the world, I think he should be sued from here to Pluto. On MSNBC.com.

This just in... , , , , , , , , ,

Did you enjoy this post? If so, please comment on it or share a little link love:
Add to Del.icio.us Add to Del.icio.us    Technorati This Technorati This    Digg This Digg This    Stumble It Stumble it!    Twit This Tweet This

Interesting Links, July 4, 2010

July 4th, 2010 by Maria Langer

Here are links I found interesting on July 4, 2010:

  • A Cold Man’s Warm Words – The Wall Street Journal provides some interesting information about the actual writing of the Declaration of Independence. Thanks to @estherschinder (an editor, of course!) for sharing the link.
  • Life, Liberty, and 140 Characters – The winners of Slate's contest to rewrite the Declaration of Independence in a single tweet.
  • The Declaration Of Independence, Read Aloud By NPR Staff – "Twenty-two years ago, Morning Edition launched what has become an Independence Day tradition: hosts, reporters, newscasters and commentators reading the Declaration of Independence." Listen in to this year's reading. It'll remind you what freedom really means.

This just in... , , , , , , , , ,

Did you enjoy this post? If so, please comment on it or share a little link love:
Add to Del.icio.us Add to Del.icio.us    Technorati This Technorati This    Digg This Digg This    Stumble It Stumble it!    Twit This Tweet This

Interesting Links, June 12, 2010

June 12th, 2010 by Maria Langer

Here are links I found interesting on June 12, 2010:

  • Mind Over Mass Media – New York Times Op Ed about the true effects of social networking and technology.
  • Publishing Company Under Fire for Putting Warning Label on Constitution – Never thought I'd be linking to an article on FOXNews, but this is too idiotic not to share. What the hell is wrong with this country these days? Thanks to @dcolanduno for sharing this link.
  • Teen Sailor’s Rescue Raises Safety, Expense Issues – "The rescue of Abby Sunderland, the teen sailor stranded in the Indian Ocean, could reignite a debate not only about the advisability of minors attempting record-breaking feats, but of the cost of difficult and dangerous search and rescue operations for individuals who knowingly embark on high-risk adventures." This really irks me. Read more on NPR.

This just in... , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Did you enjoy this post? If so, please comment on it or share a little link love:
Add to Del.icio.us Add to Del.icio.us    Technorati This Technorati This    Digg This Digg This    Stumble It Stumble it!    Twit This Tweet This