<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word 2004 Does Not Like Mac OS X 10.5.8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2009/08/08/word-2004-does-not-like-mac-os-x-1058/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2009/08/08/word-2004-does-not-like-mac-os-x-1058/</link>
	<description>Web site and blog for Maria Langer, freelance writer, commercial helicopter pilot, and serious amateur photographer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Langer</title>
		<link>http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2009/08/08/word-2004-does-not-like-mac-os-x-1058/#comment-2726</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2009/08/08/word-2004-does-not-like-mac-os-x-1058/#comment-2726</guid>
		<description>Joe: Sure it&#039;ll install. But it won&#039;t &quot;work fine.&quot; I know this to be a FACT because I tried it. If you don&#039;t mind waiting for your computer to respond to the simplest of commands, then, by all means, put Leopard on a G4. But if you&#039;d prefer that same computer to work WELL, Tiger should be the last stop.

Want the details? Read them here: http://www.mariasguides.com/2007/12/19/downgrading-from-leopard/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe: Sure it&#8217;ll install. But it won&#8217;t &#8220;work fine.&#8221; I know this to be a FACT because I tried it. If you don&#8217;t mind waiting for your computer to respond to the simplest of commands, then, by all means, put Leopard on a G4. But if you&#8217;d prefer that same computer to work WELL, Tiger should be the last stop.</p>
<p>Want the details? Read them here: <a href="http://www.mariasguides.com/2007/12/19/downgrading-from-leopard/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mariasguides.com/2007/12/19/downgrading-from-leopard/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2009/08/08/word-2004-does-not-like-mac-os-x-1058/#comment-2725</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2009/08/08/word-2004-does-not-like-mac-os-x-1058/#comment-2725</guid>
		<description>&quot;My old 12-inch PowerBook would be a good example. It has a G4 processor and runs Tiger. That&#039;s as advanced as it will ever get.&quot;

You do know that Leopard will install to any G4 Mac from 867mhz up, right? Your 12 inch Powerbook should work fine with Leopard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My old 12-inch PowerBook would be a good example. It has a G4 processor and runs Tiger. That&#8217;s as advanced as it will ever get.&#8221;</p>
<p>You do know that Leopard will install to any G4 Mac from 867mhz up, right? Your 12 inch Powerbook should work fine with Leopard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

