<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Mistakes? Or Choices?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2007/08/02/blog-mistakes-or-choices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2007/08/02/blog-mistakes-or-choices/</link>
	<description>Web site and blog for Maria Langer, freelance writer, commercial helicopter pilot, and serious amateur photographer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:33:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markk</title>
		<link>http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2007/08/02/blog-mistakes-or-choices/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>Markk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2007/08/02/blog-mistakes-or-choices/#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on #5, I too browse in tabs, and if it&#039;s an external link... new tab... if it&#039;s content within my own pages I use the browsers back button... keep breaking some of those rules, have to make it &quot;personal&quot; to you... after all it IS your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on #5, I too browse in tabs, and if it&#8217;s an external link&#8230; new tab&#8230; if it&#8217;s content within my own pages I use the browsers back button&#8230; keep breaking some of those rules, have to make it &#8220;personal&#8221; to you&#8230; after all it IS your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miraz Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2007/08/02/blog-mistakes-or-choices/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>Miraz Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2007/08/02/blog-mistakes-or-choices/#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>The long pages is another thing. I&#039;m with you about writing a blog for my own reasons and not as a means to generate income. Posts and pages need to be as long as they need to be, and I don&#039;t like breaking posts with the more button because it means the RSS feed only has a partial post. And, as you say, it&#039;s an inconvenience for the reader.

On my Learning Centre though I always break the posts because I see that site as a reference. For me it just wouldn&#039;t work to have loads of long long posts on one page. But then while I use WordPress behind that site it&#039;s not a blog. I wouldn&#039;t expect people to read every item, but instead to visit, find one item and read that.

I think blogs are a bit different from more static sites.

In general the caution is a good one - I&#039;ve seen sites where they&#039;ve tried to cram everything they want to say on to one single page and it can be a huge mess.

Connection speed can also be a factor. If you have a fast connection it&#039;s annoying to click through a dozen pages to read one article. If you have a really slow or expensive connection then that night be a better approach...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The long pages is another thing. I&#8217;m with you about writing a blog for my own reasons and not as a means to generate income. Posts and pages need to be as long as they need to be, and I don&#8217;t like breaking posts with the more button because it means the RSS feed only has a partial post. And, as you say, it&#8217;s an inconvenience for the reader.</p>
<p>On my Learning Centre though I always break the posts because I see that site as a reference. For me it just wouldn&#8217;t work to have loads of long long posts on one page. But then while I use WordPress behind that site it&#8217;s not a blog. I wouldn&#8217;t expect people to read every item, but instead to visit, find one item and read that.</p>
<p>I think blogs are a bit different from more static sites.</p>
<p>In general the caution is a good one &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen sites where they&#8217;ve tried to cram everything they want to say on to one single page and it can be a huge mess.</p>
<p>Connection speed can also be a factor. If you have a fast connection it&#8217;s annoying to click through a dozen pages to read one article. If you have a really slow or expensive connection then that night be a better approach&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miraz Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2007/08/02/blog-mistakes-or-choices/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>Miraz Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aneclecticmind.com/2007/08/02/blog-mistakes-or-choices/#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>These rules can always be broken by choice when people, like you, have clear reasoning behind their choices. I think your choices work well.

I can cast a bit of extra light on a couple.

The &#039;new windows&#039; thing is for three reasons:

a] blind or sight-impaired people who may have no idea what&#039;s going on with a new window because you and I can *see* it happen, but they can&#039;t.

b] I&#039;ve sat beside plenty of &#039;newbies&#039; who are just totally confused by a new window. They often have no idea what&#039;s going on or how to deal with it. By the time they quit their browser they have 20 windows open and are totally bewildered.

c] I haven&#039;t had much opportunity to use &#039;other&#039; devices such as cellphones etc, but as I understand it they might not handle the new window thing so well.

The thing is that opening a new window is fine if you either tell the visitor that&#039;s what will happen, or give them a choice somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These rules can always be broken by choice when people, like you, have clear reasoning behind their choices. I think your choices work well.</p>
<p>I can cast a bit of extra light on a couple.</p>
<p>The &#8216;new windows&#8217; thing is for three reasons:</p>
<p>a] blind or sight-impaired people who may have no idea what&#8217;s going on with a new window because you and I can *see* it happen, but they can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>b] I&#8217;ve sat beside plenty of &#8216;newbies&#8217; who are just totally confused by a new window. They often have no idea what&#8217;s going on or how to deal with it. By the time they quit their browser they have 20 windows open and are totally bewildered.</p>
<p>c] I haven&#8217;t had much opportunity to use &#8216;other&#8217; devices such as cellphones etc, but as I understand it they might not handle the new window thing so well.</p>
<p>The thing is that opening a new window is fine if you either tell the visitor that&#8217;s what will happen, or give them a choice somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

